Impact of weight and creatinine adjustments on the accuracy of Cockcroft-gault equation in hematopoietic cell transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients undergo pre- transplant renal function evaluation to confirm transplant eligibility and tailor pharmacotherapy. There is limited evidence regarding the most accurate method of estimating creatinine clearance (CrCl) within this patient population and no studies exist that evaluate the weight utilized within the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation in HCT patients. This study evaluates different weight and serum creatinine (SCr) adjustments utilized within the CG equation estimating for renal clearance in patients undergoing HCT. OBJECTIVE: This is a retrospective, single center analysis of adult HCT patients who underwent pre-transplant evaluation with a measured CrCl using a 24-h urine creatinine collection. The primary outcome was to evaluate the correlation of various weights used in estimation of CrCl compared to measured CrCl. Key secondary outcomes include evaluation of the impact of various weights on estimated CrCl in subpopulations, evaluation of adjusting SCr to pre-determined limits, and determination of an appropriate obesity threshold to utilize body weight adjustments. RESULTS: Seven-hundred and forty-two patients were included in the study. In the primary analysis, CG utilizing adjusted body weight (ADjBW0.4 ) had a greater correlation (r = .812) to measured CrCl when compared to total or ideal body weight (r = .801 and r = .790 respectively). The threshold of 120% of ideal body weight (IBW) produced less bias and greater accuracy in comparison to the threshold of 140% IBW. In patients 60 years or older, rounding low SCr values up .8 or 1 mg/dL resulted in decreased correlation and a greater mean difference in comparison to not rounding SCr. CONCLUSION: In HCT patients who are overweight or obese, ADjBW .4 is the most accurate weight for the CG equation. In HCT patients who have a total body weight < 120% IBW, total body weight is the most accurate weight to utilize. Rounding up low SCr to .8 or 1 mg/dL does not improve the accuracy or led to less bias of the CG equation.

Belumosudil Impacts Immunosuppression Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Belumosudil (BEL) is a novel Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in patients who have failed 2 or more prior lines of systemic therapy. Although the pharmacokinetic effects of BEL on other immunosuppressive (IS) agents have not been clinically evaluated, in vitro data indicate that BEL may have possible interactions with drugs with a narrow therapeutic index used to treat cGVHD, such as tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine, through cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) and p-glycoprotein interactions. Further evaluation of these potential interactions is warranted to optimize the safety and effectiveness of these medications when combined with BEL. In this study, we investigated the potential effects of BEL on sirolimus and tacrolimus levels when used concurrently by assessing changes in IS levels after the addition of BEL. This retrospective single-center study of patients who started BEL while on tacrolimus and/or sirolimus between February 1, 2019, to February 1, 2023, included patients who had IS levels measured at baseline prior to starting BEL and at least 1 subsequent IS measurement to assess changes over time. The primary endpoint was the concentration-dose (C/D) ratio analyzed before and after the addition of BEL. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of IS levels outside of the therapeutic range (subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic) and mean dosage changes over time. Thirty-seven patients met our eligibility criteria and were included in this analysis. Patients taking sirolimus (n = 30) or tacrolimus (n = 16) concurrently with BEL had a statistically significant increase in the C/D ratio (sirolimus recipients, 160% [P < .001]; tacrolimus recipients, 113% [P = .013]) between the pre-BEL and final post-BEL assessments. The C/D ratios for both tacrolimus and sirolimus recipients continued to increase at several time points after initiation of BEL, indicating that multiple drug dosage adjustments may be required. After BEL initiation, 19% of tacrolimus levels and 57% of sirolimus levels were supratherapeutic. Despite dosage adjustments, 27% of tacrolimus levels were supratherapeutic at both the second and third assessments after starting BEL, and 28% and 30% of sirolimus levels were supratherapeutic at these 2 time points, respectively. All 12 of the patients who discontinued BEL during the study period (100%) showed a return to their baseline C/D ratio, confirming that the C/D ratio change can be attributed to BEL. The impact of BEL on IS levels is clinically significant, warranting dosage adjustments of concurrent medications. A significant number of patients taking sirolimus with BEL had levels >15 ng/mL during the study period, indicating a potential risk for toxicity if this interaction is unmonitored. We recommend empiric dose reductions of 25% for tacrolimus and 25% to 50% for sirolimus when adding BEL, as well as close monitoring of IS levels during the initial weeks of BEL therapy. Future studies are warranted to better describe the impact of BEL on patients taking CYP3A inhibitors.